Scores
Dev
Go Pro
← Player leaders
Bhayshul Tuten

#33Bhayshul Tuten

Bhayshul Tuten is a Explosive Back for Virginia Tech. Bhayshul's 2023 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 198 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2023 Production

Rushing
863 Rush yards10 Rush TD173 Carries5.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
27 Receptions239 Rec yards2 Rec TD8.9 Yards/rec
Returns
19 Kick returns550 KR yards2 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.69 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Syracuse (SP+ -4).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State20162920.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State20203010.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State20183160.3304.6104.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan20212800.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Old Dominion: -0.13 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Purdue: -0.25 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Rutgers: +0.16 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Marshall: +0.53 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Pittsburgh: +0.13 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Florida State: +0.12 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Wake Forest: -0.26 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Syracuse: +0.69 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Louisville: -0.13 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Boston College: +0.43 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs NC State: -0.65 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Virginia: +0.18 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Tulane: +0.42 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsOld DominionW36-17-10.119552.90150-0.13
2vsPurdueL17-24-7.3840.502451-0.25
3@RutgersL16-353.511454.110.16
4@MarshallL17-24-9.09889.8054500.53
5vsPittsburghW38-21-7.3241094.5043710.13
6@Florida StateL17-3919.48293.6142500.12
7vsWake ForestW30-13-7.913302.314470-0.26
9vsSyracuseW38-10-4.4181186.6111100.69
10@LouisvilleL3-348.011575.20330-0.13
11@Boston CollegeW48-22-5.916784.930.43
12vsNC StateL28-357.42-3-1.50-0.65
13@VirginiaW55-17-10.8161177.311200.18
1vsTulaneW41-202.8181367.6221900.42

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
24.5%
Passing plays
9.2%
Rushing plays
36.7%
Standard downs
27.5%
Passing downs
18.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.36
Pass / Rush EPA
0.47 / 0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
2024 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.