Blake Jarwin Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Oklahoma State

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs TE peers

Player type

Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)—

Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.52 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 2.97 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Texas Tech (SP+ 5).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	EPA/play	Pass	Rush
1	Central Michigan	—	-3.1	1.42	1.42	—
1	Ole Miss	—	27.0	0.45	0.45	—
4	Texas	—	3.7	0.91	0.91	—
6	West Virginia	—	12.9	0.96	0.96	—
8	Kansas	—	-21.3	1.46	1.46	—
9	Texas Tech	—	4.5	2.97	2.97	—
10	TCU	—	19.0	1.67	1.67	—
11	Iowa State	—	-0.3	-0.29	0.44	-1.76

Snap-share proxy

Overall

3.3%

Passing plays

6.0%

Rushing plays

0.3%

Standard downs

2.7%

Passing downs

4.2%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs Iowa StateWk 11

EPA -0.3