Chigoziem Okonkwo Stats, EPA & Player Profile

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs TE peers

Player type

Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Peak game: 2.36 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Nebraska (SP+ 3).

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Ty Thompson	Tulane	2024	48	0.420	0.4	20.2
Seth Green	Minnesota	2018	83	0.390	0.0	32.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsHoward	W79-0	—	2	9	4.5	1	5	0.22
2	vsSyracuse	W63-20	-3.0	3	45	15.0	0	23	1.43
3	@Temple	L17-20	3.2	4	37	9.3	0	13	0.35
6	@Rutgers	W48-7	-14.6	2	30	15.0	0	16	1.28
8	vsIndiana	L28-34	12.8	5	43	8.6	1	12	0.96
9	@Minnesota	L10-52	19.4	—	—	—	—	—	-0.66
10	vsMichigan	L7-38	20.7	2	26	13.0	0	22	0.80
13	vsNebraska	L7-54	2.6	1	11	11.0	0	11	2.36

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

4.7%

Passing plays

9.9%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

4.1%

Passing downs

5.7%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.69
Passing downs: 1.05
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.83 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).