Christian Trahan Stats, EPA & Player Profile

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs TE peers

Player type

Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency58th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 1.22 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 1.90 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Hawai'i (SP+ -7).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
6	vsTulane	W49-31	4.2	1	3	3.0	0	3	-0.36
7	vsBYU	L26-43	19.2	3	69	23.0	1	26	—
8	@Navy	W37-21	-9.3	1	6	6.0	0	6	0.14
10	@Cincinnati	L10-38	18.6	4	21	5.3	0	11	0.05
11	vsSouth Florida	W56-21	-11.4	3	23	7.7	1	9	0.84
15	@Memphis	L27-30	5.7	5	84	16.8	0	34	0.57
1	vsHawai'i	L14-28	-7.1	5	88	17.6	1	26	1.90

Snap-share proxy

Overall

5.8%

Passing plays

10.9%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

4.8%

Passing downs

7.6%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs Hawai'iWk 1

EPA 1.9

Rec 5 · Rec Yds 88 · Avg 17.6 · Rec TD 1