Daniel Montiel Stats, EPA & Player Profile

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs TE peers

Player type

Red Zone Weapon TE

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)—

Game-to-game consistency85th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.57 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 3.35 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Navy (SP+ 12).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
2	@Kansas	W55-23	-21.3	2	26	13.0	1	23	1.83
3	@Bowling Green	W44-41	7.5	3	13	4.3	1	6	1.24
7	vsOle Miss	W37-24	27.0	1	17	17.0	0	17	1.59
10	vsNavy	L20-45	12.1	1	60	60.0	0	60	3.35
11	@Houston	L34-35	6.2	2	24	12.0	0	19	0.47
13	vsSMU	W63-0	-17.5	1	15	15.0	1	15	2.56

Snap-share proxy

Overall

2.0%

Passing plays

4.5%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

2.6%

Passing downs

0.6%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs SMUWk 13

EPA 2.6

Rec 1 · Rec Yds 15 · Avg 15.0 · Rec TD 1