David Morgan Ii Stats, EPA & Player Profile

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs TE peers

Player type

Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)—

Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.47 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 2.21 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Arizona (SP+ 8).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	@Houston	W27-7	5.4	1	13	13.0	0	13	0.17
2	vsArizona	L23-26	7.6	5	76	15.2	1	25	2.21
3	@Oklahoma State	L13-43	8.6	4	54	13.5	0	21	1.05
5	@Florida Atlantic	L37-41	-10.4	4	53	13.3	0	21	0.83
11	@Rice	L7-17	-3.1	2	23	11.5	0	16	0.60
12	vsSouthern Miss	W12-10	-15.9	2	15	7.5	0	9	0.95
14	vsNorth Texas	W34-27	-9.4	2	21	10.5	0	14	0.48

Snap-share proxy

Overall

5.0%

Passing plays

10.2%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

4.6%

Passing downs

5.9%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs North TexasWk 14

EPA 0.5

Rec 2 · Rec Yds 21 · Avg 10.5 · Rec TD 0