← Player leaders
Elijah Sarratt is a Vertical Threat WR for Indiana. Elijah's 2024 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 51 plays — a elite rate for the WR.
2024 Production
Receiving
53 Receptions957 Rec yards8 Rec TD18.1 Yards/rec
Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers
Player type
Vertical Threat WR
Elite deep receiver who stretches the field. Wins downfield, commands safety attention, and creates the threat that opens underneath routes.
Downfield threatYAC upsideCreates space for teammates
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency84th %ile · above avg
Key findings
- ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
- ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸12 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
- ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.09 from the first to second half of the season.
- ▸Peak game: 3.02 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Nebraska (SP+ 6).
NIL Market Tier· 2024
On3 valuation ↗Elite
Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Rec | Rec Yds | Avg | Rec TD | Long | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsFlorida International | W31-7 | -12.1 | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 0 | 7 | 0.33 |
| 2 | vsWestern Illinois | W77-3 | — | 6 | 137 | 22.8 | 1 | 71 | 2.00 |
| 3 | @UCLA | W42-13 | -1.3 | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 0 | 24 | 1.60 |
| 4 | vsCharlotte | W52-14 | -15.3 | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 0 | 29 | 0.98 |
| 5 | vsMaryland | W42-28 | -3.9 | 7 | 128 | 18.3 | 1 | 36 | 1.76 |
| 6 | vsNorthwestern | W41-24 | -8.2 | 7 | 135 | 19.3 | 0 | 29 | 1.59 |
| 8 | vsNebraska | W56-7 | 5.5 | 3 | 65 | 21.7 | 1 | 28 | 3.02 |
| 9 | vsWashington | W31-17 | 3.1 | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 | 12 | 0.89 |
| 10 | @Michigan State | W47-10 | -4.6 | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 2 | 35 | 1.81 |
| 11 | vsMichigan | W20-15 | 10.6 | 1 | 36 | 36.0 | 1 | 36 | 3.01 |
| 13 | @Ohio State | L15-38 | 31.2 | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 0 | 19 | 0.57 |
| 14 | vsPurdue | W66-0 | -16.2 | 8 | 165 | 20.6 | 2 | 84 | 1.75 |
| 1 | @Notre Dame | L17-27 | 23.9 | 4 | 67 | 16.8 | 0 | 28 | 0.78 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.8%
Passing plays
15.3%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
6.0%
Passing downs
9.0%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 1.14
- Passing downs
- 2.34
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 1.52 / —
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).