Gabe Nabers Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Florida State

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs TE peers

Player type

Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.75 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 2.51 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Virginia (SP+ 6).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsBoise State	L31-36	8.1	1	5	5.0	1	5	1.88
3	@Virginia	L24-31	6.3	1	10	10.0	1	10	2.51
4	vsLouisville	W35-24	0.2	3	45	15.0	0	17	0.94
8	@Wake Forest	L20-22	2.0	2	31	15.5	0	27	1.94
10	vsMiami	L10-27	9.6	3	40	13.3	0	18	0.58
12	vsAlabama State	W49-12	—	2	68	34.0	0	63	1.57
14	@Florida	L17-40	24.0	3	22	7.3	0	9	0.94

Snap-share proxy

Overall

3.4%

Passing plays

6.3%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

4.6%

Passing downs

1.2%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

@ FloridaWk 14

EPA 0.9

Rec 3 · Rec Yds 22 · Avg 7.3 · Rec TD 0