Griffin Hebert Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Louisiana Tech

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs TE peers

Player type

Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.23 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 2.35 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Houston Christian.

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
3	@Southern Miss	W31-30	-7.9	5	48	9.6	2	16	1.15
4	vsHouston Christian	W66-38	—	2	47	23.5	0	24	2.35
5	@BYU	L14-45	19.2	1	7	7.0	0	7	0.71
7	vsMarshall	L17-35	9.5	4	66	16.5	0	50	1.18
8	@UTSA	L26-27	-9.6	2	13	6.5	0	7	-0.02
9	vsUAB	W37-34	6.3	1	42	42.0	0	42	0.21
14	@North Texas	W42-31	-8.0	2	24	12.0	0	12	0.87
15	@TCU	L10-52	1.6	2	28	14.0	1	15	2.26
1	vsGeorgia Southern	L3-38	0.2	—	—	—	—	—	—

Snap-share proxy

Overall

4.2%

Passing plays

7.7%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

3.8%

Passing downs

5.3%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs Georgia SouthernWk 1

Rec — · Rec Yds — · Avg — · Rec TD —