J P Holtz Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Pittsburgh

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs TE peers

Player type

Red Zone Weapon TE

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)—

Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.77 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 2.66 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Duke (SP+ 7).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
2	@Boston College	W30-20	4.9	3	17	5.7	0	9	-0.01
3	@Florida International	W42-25	-16.2	1	13	13.0	0	13	—
5	vsAkron	L10-21	-9.4	1	17	17.0	0	17	1.13
6	@Virginia	L19-24	4.0	4	40	10.0	1	17	1.09
9	vsGeorgia Tech	L28-56	11.2	3	34	11.3	0	22	1.36
10	vsDuke	L48-51	7.0	2	14	7.0	2	11	2.66
12	@North Carolina	L35-40	0.0	4	31	7.8	0	13	0.75
1	vsHouston	L34-35	5.4	3	33	11.0	1	16	1.26

Snap-share proxy

Overall

4.3%

Passing plays

10.6%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

3.7%

Passing downs

6.0%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs HoustonWk 1

EPA 1.3

Rec 3 · Rec Yds 33 · Avg 11.0 · Rec TD 1