Jahleel Billingsley Stats, EPA & Player Profile

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs TE peers

Player type

Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency82th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.37 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 2.04 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Auburn (SP+ 13).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
8	@Tennessee	W48-17	0.9	1	13	13.0	0	13	0.28
12	vsKentucky	W63-3	2.2	3	78	26.0	0	34	1.67
13	vsAuburn	W42-13	12.6	2	33	16.5	1	24	2.04
14	@LSU	W55-17	6.0	4	68	17.0	1	27	1.63
16	vsFlorida	W52-46	19.8	2	29	14.5	0	15	-0.03
1	vsNotre Dame	W31-14	21.0	4	39	9.8	1	15	1.45
1	vsOhio State	W52-24	28.4	2	27	13.5	0	22	1.45

Snap-share proxy

Overall

4.3%

Passing plays

8.2%

Rushing plays

0.4%

Standard downs

4.6%

Passing downs

3.3%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs Ohio StateWk 1

EPA 1.4

Rec 2 · Rec Yds 27 · Avg 13.5 · Rec TD 0