Kenny Yeboah Stats, EPA & Player Profile

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs TE peers

Player type

Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency71th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.77 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 3.61 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Maryland (SP+ 3).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
2	vsBuffalo	L29-36	-1.1	3	16	5.3	0	7	0.38
3	@Maryland	W35-14	3.0	1	47	47.0	1	47	3.61
7	@Navy	W24-17	-10.2	1	7	7.0	0	7	0.54
10	@UCF	L40-52	16.5	2	31	15.5	0	16	1.20
11	@Houston	W59-49	2.3	2	27	13.5	0	18	1.42
12	vsSouth Florida	W27-17	-1.2	2	15	7.5	0	9	0.49
1	vsDuke	L27-56	5.0	2	11	5.5	0	8	0.32

Snap-share proxy

Overall

2.8%

Passing plays

5.7%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

2.4%

Passing downs

3.5%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs DukeWk 1

EPA 0.3

Rec 2 · Rec Yds 11 · Avg 5.5 · Rec TD 0