Maaseiah Francis Stats, EPA & Player Profile

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs TE peers

Player type

Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)—

Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.85 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 2.00 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Georgia State (SP+ -12).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
2	vsGeorgia Southern	L9-24	-3.9	1	9	9.0	0	9	1.25
4	vsNicholls	W41-40	—	1	26	26.0	0	26	1.32
7	@Arkansas State	L7-17	-1.2	2	28	14.0	0	22	1.27
9	vsGeorgia State	W13-10	-12.1	1	11	11.0	0	11	2.00
12	vsPresbyterian	W31-7	—	5	36	7.2	0	21	0.34
13	@Idaho	L31-38	-8.6	7	146	20.9	2	75	1.42
14	vsNew Mexico State	W35-28	-17.2	1	5	5.0	0	5	-0.47

Snap-share proxy

Overall

4.2%

Passing plays

8.7%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

4.3%

Passing downs

4.1%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs New Mexico StateWk 14

EPA -0.5

Rec 1 · Rec Yds 5 · Avg 5.0 · Rec TD 0