Micky Crum Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Louisville

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs TE peers

Player type

Red Zone Weapon TE

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)—

Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Peak game: 1.73 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Houston (SP+ 6).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsAuburn	L24-31	14.6	2	19	9.5	0	12	1.18
2	vsHouston	L31-34	6.2	6	103	17.2	1	29	1.73
3	vsClemson	L17-20	24.0	4	36	9.0	0	23	0.44
4	vsSamford	W45-3	—	1	3	3.0	1	3	1.05
1	vsTexas A&M	W27-21	14.1	1	2	2.0	1	2	0.08

Snap-share proxy

Overall

4.7%

Passing plays

9.4%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

5.6%

Passing downs

2.6%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs Texas A&MWk 1

EPA 0.1

Rec 1 · Rec Yds 2 · Avg 2.0 · Rec TD 1