Noah Gray Stats, EPA & Player Profile

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs TE peers

Player type

Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.92 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 2.83 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Virginia (SP+ 7).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
2	@Northwestern	W21-7	1.9	2	26	13.0	0	26	-0.23
4	vsNorth Carolina Central	W55-13	—	1	17	17.0	0	17	1.57
5	vsVirginia Tech	L14-31	3.9	2	38	19.0	1	23

Snap-share proxy

Overall

3.1%

Passing plays

5.7%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

2.7%

Passing downs

3.9%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs TempleWk 1

EPA 0.2

Rec 1 · Rec Yds 6 · Avg 6.0 · Rec TD 0