Shaq Williams Stats, EPA & Player Profile

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs TE peers

Player type

Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)—

Game-to-game consistency76th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.09 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 2.32 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Arizona State (SP+ -3).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsAlabama State	W26-13	—	3	63	21.0	0	51	1.09
3	vsArizona State	L28-32	-3.0	2	37	18.5	1	24	2.32
4	@Old Dominion	L19-33	-0.7	1	2	2.0	0	2	-0.11
6	vsSouthern Miss	W55-32	0.7	1	8	8.0	0	8	0.98
7	@Rice	W14-13	-16.5	2	10	5.0	0	10	-0.07
8	vsUTEP	L49-52	-16.1	1	3	3.0	1	3	—
12	@Texas A&M	L10-23	12.0	2	27	13.5	0	15	1.45
13	vsCharlotte	W33-14	-20.9	1	8	8.0	0	8	1.55

Snap-share proxy

Overall

2.8%

Passing plays

5.6%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

2.9%

Passing downs

2.4%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs CharlotteWk 13

EPA 1.6

Rec 1 · Rec Yds 8 · Avg 8.0 · Rec TD 0