Sat, Aug 30, 11:30 PM
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSU | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 17 |
| CLEM | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
Our model blends Elo ratings (CLEM Elo 1704, LSU Elo 1718) plus home-field advantage. That projects CLEM -1.8 (55% to win) — 3.2 points of value on LSU versus the market line of -5.
Tied entering the 4th quarter. Across 1,332 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
LSU 17, Clemson 10.
No — the model picked CLEM, which didn't hit. We report the misses too.
Why trust the number?Gridpex's model is walk-forward validated on 2014–24, out-of-sample: +0.28 pts mean Closing Line Value and 53.5% beat the close. We report the record — wins and losses — never fake locks.
I had CLEM pregame and it didn't hit. We report the misses — that was one.