← Player leaders
Arch Manning is a Dual-Threat QB for Texas. Arch's 2024 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 87 plays — a elite rate for the QB.
2024 Production
Passing
61/90 Comp/Att938 Pass yards9 Pass TD2 INT67.8% Comp %
Rushing
108 Rush yards4 Rush TD25 Carries4.3 Yards/carry
Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers
Player type
Dual-Threat QB
A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.
Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Key findings
- ▸Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
- ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.48 from the first to second half of the season.
- ▸Peak game: 2.58 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Clemson (SP+ 13).
NIL Market Tier· 2024
On3 valuation ↗Elite
Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | C/ATT | Pass Yds | Pass TD | INT | QBR | Rush Yds | Rush TD | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsColorado State | W52-0 | -5.7 | 5/6 | 95 | 1 | 0 | 91.6 | 0 | 1 | 0.92 |
| 3 | vsUTSA | W56-7 | 2.2 | 9/12 | 223 | 4 | 0 | 99.9 | 53 | 1 | 1.55 |
| 4 | vsUL Monroe | W51-3 | -16.7 | 15/29 | 258 | 2 | 2 | 71.3 | -4 | 0 | 0.38 |
| 5 | vsMississippi State | W35-13 | -4.1 | 26/31 | 324 | 2 | 0 | 79.5 | 33 | 1 | 0.78 |
| 8 | vsGeorgia | L15-30 | 24.3 | 3/6 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 14.8 | -1 | 0 | -0.06 |
| 11 | vsFlorida | W49-17 | 13.8 | 3/6 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 23.4 | — | — | -0.07 |
| 14 | @Texas A&M | W17-7 | 17.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 14 | 1 | 0.81 |
| 15 | vsGeorgia | L19-22 | 24.3 | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | 0 | 0.07 |
| 1 | vsClemson | W38-24 | 13.3 | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 2.58 |
| 1 | vsOhio State | L14-28 | 31.2 | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 0 | 2.58 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
15.9%
Passing plays
25.9%
Rushing plays
5.5%
Standard downs
14.8%
Passing downs
18.5%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 0.39
- Passing downs
- 1.27
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 0.65 / 0.98
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).