Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Caden Durham

#29Caden Durham

RB·LSU·2024

Caden Durham is a Explosive Back for LSU. Caden's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 164 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2024 Production

Rushing
754 Rush yards6 Rush TD138 Carries5.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
28 Receptions260 Rec yards2 Rec TD9.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency15th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.39 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.83 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs South Alabama (SP+ 3).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State20162920.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State20203010.3404.5102.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 2 vs Nicholls: -0.27 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs South Carolina: +0.69 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UCLA: +0.07 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs South Alabama: +1.83 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Ole Miss: -0.28 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Arkansas: +0.31 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas A&M: -0.17 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Alabama: -0.11 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Florida: +0.14 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Vanderbilt: +0.02 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Oklahoma: +0.24 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Baylor: -0.10 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2vsNichollsW44-21492.30-0.27
3@South CarolinaW36-3316.911988.921100.69
4vsUCLAW34-17-1.36142.3024010.07
5vsSouth AlabamaW42-102.8712818.3138911.83
7vsOle MissW29-2627.912373.103110-0.28
8@ArkansasW34-1011.0211014.831700.31
9@Texas A&ML23-3817.011151.404560-0.17
11vsAlabamaL13-4225.08637.904-20-0.11
12@FloridaL16-2713.820914.6031700.14
13vsVanderbiltW24-174.914584.102600.02
14vsOklahomaW37-179.511807.3043200.24
1vsBaylorW44-318.413604.60130-0.10

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
20.0%
Passing plays
5.9%
Rushing plays
41.3%
Standard downs
20.6%
Passing downs
18.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
0.18
Pass / Rush EPA
0.50 / 0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.