Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Cameron Ward

Cameron Ward

Line value
14 pts
NFL Draft Outlook1st Round· model estimate based on position rank

Cameron Ward is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Miami. Cameron's 2024 season ranks in the 93th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 493 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

2024 Production

Passing
305/454 Comp/Att4313 Pass yards39 Pass TD7 INT67.2% Comp %
Rushing
204 Rush yards4 Rush TD60 Carries3.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)93th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency86th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.21 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.09 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Ball State (SP+ -20).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Tanner MordecaiSMU20215100.63014.0321.5
Malik CunninghamLouisville20215020.68114.7341.6
Kaidon SalterLiberty20234860.71114.7345.6
Stetson BennettGeorgia20225090.63512.4323.0
Blake SimsAlabama20144730.69615.4329.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Florida: +0.67 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida A&M: +0.69 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Ball State: +1.09 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs South Florida: +0.90 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Virginia Tech: +0.48 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs California: +0.21 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Louisville: +0.58 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Florida State: +0.17 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Duke: +0.55 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Georgia Tech: +0.29 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Wake Forest: +0.36 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Syracuse: +0.84 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Iowa State: +0.56 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@FloridaW41-1713.826/353853195.73300.67
2vsFlorida A&MW56-920/263043092.31310.69
3vsBall StateW62-0-19.819/283465093.81.09
4@South FloridaW50-15-2.324/344043194.14300.90
5vsVirginia TechW38-3410.024/383434289.45710.48
6@CaliforniaW39-384.035/534372181.71510.21
8@LouisvilleW52-4513.621/323194093.32900.58
9vsFlorida StateW36-14-3.222/352080071.7-400.17
10vsDukeW53-315.625/414005194.2100.55
11@Georgia TechL23-281.925/393483058.8-500.29
13vsWake ForestW42-14-5.727/382802150.7-510.36
14@SyracuseL38-425.525/363492092.81900.84
1vsIowa StateL41-4210.312/191903097.6800.56

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
54.8%
Passing plays
91.8%
Rushing plays
9.2%
Standard downs
48.1%
Passing downs
73.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.36
Passing downs
0.83
Pass / Rush EPA
0.50 / 0.91

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
2024
2023 — 2024 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueWEPA/playYoY ΔTotal EPA
2023Washington State
4.9
0.387232.4
2024Miami
14
0.612+0.22317.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.