Scores
Dev
Go Pro
← Player leaders
Ja'Kobi Lane

#8Ja'Kobi Lane

WR·USC·2024

Ja'Kobi Lane is a Red Zone Weapon WR for USC. Ja'Kobi's 2024 season produced 71.0 total EPA across 44 plays.

2024 Production

Receiving
43 Receptions525 Rec yards12 Rec TD12.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Red Zone Weapon WR

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency86th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 11 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.76 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 3.05 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Texas A&M (SP+ 17).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs LSU: +1.70 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Utah State: +0.25 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Michigan: +1.60 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Wisconsin: +1.14 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Minnesota: +1.00 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Penn State: +1.03 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Maryland: +1.23 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Rutgers: +1.06 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Washington: +1.69 EPA/play10Wk 13 vs UCLA: +1.69 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Notre Dame: +2.57 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Texas A&M: +3.05 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsLSUW27-2015.935016.71281.70
2vsUtah StateW48-0-10.42168.00120.25
4@MichiganL24-2710.645012.51241.60
5vsWisconsinW38-213.01010510.52321.14
6@MinnesotaL17-2410.42136.5071.00
7vsPenn StateL30-3324.62189.00101.03
8@MarylandL28-29-3.945112.81171.23
9vsRutgersW42-206.42189.00121.06
10@WashingtonL21-263.134715.70211.69
13@UCLAW19-13-1.3144.0141.69
14vsNotre DameL35-4923.93268.73122.57
1vsTexas A&MW35-3117.0712718.13333.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.3%
Passing plays
8.7%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
5.2%
Passing downs
5.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.33
Passing downs
2.30
Pass / Rush EPA
1.61 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.