← Player leaders
Josh Cameron is a Red Zone Weapon WR for Baylor. Josh's 2024 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 55 plays — a elite rate for the WR.
2024 Production
Receiving
52 Receptions754 Rec yards10 Rec TD14.5 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns8 KR yards0 KR TD14 Punt returns290 PR yards0 PR TD
Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers
Player type
Red Zone Weapon WR
Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.
Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency89th %ile · above avg
Key findings
- ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
- ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸12 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
- ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.24 from the first to second half of the season.
- ▸Peak game: 2.30 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs BYU (SP+ 15).
NIL Market Tier· 2024
On3 valuation ↗Elite
Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Rec | Rec Yds | Avg | Rec TD | Long | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsTarleton State | W45-3 | — | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 0 | 14 | 0.95 |
| 2 | @Utah | L12-23 | 7.7 | 2 | 59 | 29.5 | 1 | 47 | 2.25 |
| 3 | vsAir Force | W31-3 | -11.7 | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 0 | 25 | 1.01 |
| 4 | @Colorado | L31-38 | 8.1 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 | 0.40 |
| 5 | vsBYU | L28-34 | 15.3 | 7 | 125 | 17.9 | 2 | 34 | 2.30 |
| 6 | @Iowa State | L21-43 | 10.3 | 2 | 10 | 5.0 | 1 | 6 | 1.51 |
| 8 | @Texas Tech | W59-35 | 4.3 | 6 | 75 | 12.5 | 3 | 26 | 1.83 |
| 9 | vsOklahoma State | W38-28 | -2.6 | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 | 13 | 2.19 |
| 10 | vsTCU | W37-34 | 10.8 | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 0 | 27 | 1.79 |
| 12 | @West Virginia | W49-35 | 2.1 | 5 | 101 | 20.2 | 1 | 43 | 1.77 |
| 13 | @Houston | W20-10 | -8.2 | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 | 10 | 2.10 |
| 14 | vsKansas | W45-17 | 4.9 | 8 | 102 | 12.8 | 1 | 23 | 1.24 |
| 1 | vsLSU | L31-44 | 15.9 | 8 | 111 | 13.9 | 1 | 21 | 0.80 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.2%
Passing plays
13.1%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
6.8%
Passing downs
4.9%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 1.28
- Passing downs
- 2.06
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 1.46 / —
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).