Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Mark Fletcher Jr.

#4Mark Fletcher Jr.

RB·Miami·2024

Mark Fletcher Jr. is a Explosive Back for Miami. Mark's 2024 season ranks in the 30th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 119 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2024 Production

Rushing
607 Rush yards9 Rush TD112 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
10 Receptions106 Rec yards0 Rec TD10.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)30th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency63th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.87 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Florida A&M.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson20192130.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Florida: +0.53 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida A&M: +0.87 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Ball State: +0.36 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs South Florida: -0.27 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Virginia Tech: -0.16 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs California: +0.50 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Louisville: +0.39 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Florida State: +0.58 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Duke: +0.23 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Georgia Tech: -0.14 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Wake Forest: +0.33 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Syracuse: +0.20 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Iowa State: -0.03 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@FloridaW41-1713.87233.3212200.53
2vsFlorida A&MW56-95428.410.87
3vsBall StateW62-0-19.86538.8011600.36
4@South FloridaW50-15-2.3320.70-0.27
5vsVirginia TechW38-3410.05224.40-0.16
6@CaliforniaW39-384.011817.410.50
8@LouisvilleW52-4513.613735.6042600.39
9vsFlorida StateW36-14-3.215714.710.58
10vsDukeW53-315.612655.410.23
11@Georgia TechL23-281.94123.002260-0.14
13vsWake ForestW42-14-5.76559.200.33
14@SyracuseL38-425.513463.521900.20
1vsIowa StateL41-4210.312625.21170-0.03

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.2%
Passing plays
1.8%
Rushing plays
27.3%
Standard downs
15.5%
Passing downs
6.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
0.15
Pass / Rush EPA
0.28 / 0.28

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.