Mikey Henderson Stats, EPA & Player Profile

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs TE peers

Player type

Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency88th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Peak game: 1.50 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Oklahoma State (SP+ 14).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
2	vsMissouri State	W48-0	—	4	37	9.3	0	13	0.52
6	vsTexas	W53-45	9.7	1	15	15.0	0	15	1.28
8	@TCU	W33-14	1.6	1	13	13.0	0	13	1.14
9	@Texas Tech	W62-28	-4.2	1	13	13.0	0	13	0.87
10	vsKansas	W62-9	-16.3	1	27	27.0	0	27	0.28
12	vsOklahoma State	W41-13	14.2	3	61	20.3	1	29	1.50
16	vsIowa State	W27-21	13.3	—	—	—	—	—	1.18
1	vsFlorida	W55-20	19.8	1	2	2.0	0	2	—

Snap-share proxy

Overall

4.5%

Passing plays

5.8%

Rushing plays

3.3%

Standard downs

5.7%

Passing downs

1.4%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs FloridaWk 1

Rec 1 · Rec Yds 2 · Avg 2.0 · Rec TD 0