← Player leaders
Nate Frazier is a Committee Back for Georgia. Nate's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 135 plays — a developing rate for the RB.
2024 Production
Rushing
671 Rush yards8 Rush TD133 Carries5.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
12 Receptions85 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.1 Yards/rec
Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers
Player type
Committee Back
Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.
Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
- ▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
- ▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
- ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.36 from the first to second half of the season.
- ▸Peak game: 0.55 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Massachusetts (SP+ -22).
NIL Market Tier· 2024
On3 valuation ↗Starter
Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Car | Rush Yds | Avg | Rush TD | Rec | Rec Yds | Rec TD | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsClemson | W34-3 | 13.3 | 11 | 83 | 7.5 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 0.34 |
| 2 | vsTennessee Tech | W48-3 | — | 6 | 28 | 4.7 | 0 | — | — | — | -0.05 |
| 3 | @Kentucky | W13-12 | 5.5 | 3 | 2 | 0.7 | 0 | 1 | -5 | 0 | -0.73 |
| 6 | vsAuburn | W31-13 | 9.5 | 7 | 38 | 5.4 | 0 | — | — | — | -0.13 |
| 7 | vsMississippi State | W41-31 | -4.1 | 10 | 43 | 4.3 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.03 |
| 8 | @Texas | W30-15 | 24.1 | 4 | 10 | 2.5 | 0 | — | — | — | -0.28 |
| 10 | vsFlorida | W34-20 | 13.8 | 19 | 82 | 4.3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | -0.00 |
| 11 | @Ole Miss | L10-28 | 27.9 | 12 | 47 | 3.9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 12 | vsTennessee | W31-17 | 22.0 | 19 | 68 | 3.6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0.01 |
| 13 | vsMassachusetts | W59-21 | -21.9 | 21 | 136 | 6.5 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0.55 |
| 14 | vsGeorgia Tech | W44-42 | 1.9 | 11 | 50 | 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 0.01 |
| 15 | vsTexas | W22-19 | 24.1 | 6 | 47 | 7.8 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0.32 |
| 1 | vsNotre Dame | L10-23 | 23.9 | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 0.44 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
17.1%
Passing plays
2.8%
Rushing plays
34.5%
Standard downs
20.6%
Passing downs
8.0%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 0.07
- Passing downs
- 0.16
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 0.17 / 0.07
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).