← Player leaders
Parker Kingston is a Versatile WR for BYU.
2024 Production
Receiving
13 Receptions196 Rec yards1 Rec TD15.1 Yards/rec
Returns
17 Punt returns242 PR yards2 PR TD
Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers
Player type
Versatile WR
Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.
Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
- ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
- ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
- ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.71 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
- ▸Peak game: 2.76 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Arizona (SP+ -3).
NIL Market Tier· 2024
On3 valuation ↗Elite
Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value
Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.
| Player | Team | Yr | Plays | WEPA/play | Line val | Total EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quadree Henderson | Pittsburgh | 2016 | 63 | 0.530 | 1.6 | 33.4 |
Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Rec | Rec Yds | Avg | Rec TD | Long | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsSouthern Illinois | W41-13 | — | 1 | 36 | 36.0 | 0 | 36 | 1.90 |
| 2 | @SMU | W18-15 | 17.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 3 | @Wyoming | W34-14 | -13.6 | 2 | 30 | 15.0 | 0 | 24 | 1.45 |
| 4 | vsKansas State | W38-9 | 14.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 5 | @Baylor | W34-28 | 8.4 | — | — | — | — | — | -0.20 |
| 7 | vsArizona | W41-19 | -2.8 | 1 | 20 | 20.0 | 1 | 20 | 2.76 |
| 8 | vsOklahoma State | W38-35 | -2.6 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.49 |
| 9 | @UCF | W37-24 | 2.8 | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 0 | 20 | 0.28 |
| 11 | @Utah | W22-21 | 7.7 | 2 | 22 | 11.0 | 0 | 12 | 1.34 |
| 12 | vsKansas | L13-17 | 4.9 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.76 |
| 13 | @Arizona State | L23-28 | 9.4 | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 0 | 18 | 1.35 |
| 14 | vsHouston | W30-18 | -8.2 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.63 |
| 1 | vsColorado | W36-14 | 8.1 | 1 | 24 | 24.0 | 0 | 24 | 0.24 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.2%
Passing plays
5.0%
Rushing plays
1.6%
Standard downs
3.2%
Passing downs
3.1%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 0.75
- Passing downs
- 1.31
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 1.14 / 0.30
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).