Scores
Dev
The analytics era

Logan Bonner's gaudy season total is a trap

A big year-long pile of value and the best quarterback snap-for-snap are two different things, and mixing them up is how you end up with a bad take.

The Numbers Room
Ratings & power ·
3 min read

Logan Bonner's 2021 season is a textbook lesson in how raw volume can fool you. Snap for snap, Bonner was solid but unspectacular. Yet pile up enough snaps and even a middling snap-for-snap number adds up to a mountain: he ran 850 plays, more than almost anyone, and that sheer workload pushes him near the top of the leaderboard for total value across the whole season. The takeaway is simple. You have to ask two separate questions: how much was a quarterback worth over the entire year, and how good was he on the average snap? They don't always give the same answer.

Joe Burrow
Most worth over a full season
2019
C.J. Stroud
Best on the average snap
2021
Logan Bonner
The volume mirage
850 plays
Season total vs. per-snap quality
The lesson
two different questions
Quarterback — SeasonHow they rank
Joe Burrow — 20191st in total worth over the year
Kyler Murray — 20182nd
Baker Mayfield — 20163rd
C.J. Stroud — 20214th
Baker Mayfield — 20175th
Logan Bonner — 20216th — but on the back of huge volume, not per-snap quality
The most valuable quarterback seasons of 2014–24, measured by total worth piled up across the whole year (great-per-snap times a ton of snaps).
Quarterback — SeasonSnap-for-snap rank
C.J. Stroud — 2021Best on the average snap
Kyler Murray — 20182nd
Baker Mayfield — 20163rd
Mac Jones — 20204th
Joe Burrow — 20195th
The best quarterbacks on the average snap (minimum 350 plays) — pure per-snap quality, with the volume stripped out.

Sort by per-snap quality instead and a different name rises to the top: C.J. Stroud's 2021. On the average snap, no one in this group helped his offense more. To put the gap in human terms, the difference between an ordinary snap and a Stroud snap is roughly the difference between a coin flip and a 60/40 favorite — a real, meaningful edge that shows up every time he drops back. Kyler Murray and Baker Mayfield land right behind him, also elite snap-for-snap. The catch is that their year-long totals were lifted by how often they got the ball, too.

Only a handful of quarterbacks — Joe Burrow and C.J. Stroud chief among them — show up on both lists. They were great on the average snap and they did it for a full season's worth of snaps. That combination of quality and workload is what separates the true all-timers from the one-or-the-other crowd. Even then, you keep the obvious caveat in mind: one season is a small window and may not capture who a player really is over a career.

  • A season total rewards how much a quarterback did; per-snap quality rewards how well he did it
  • You need both to judge a player fairly
  • Lean on just one and ignore the other, and you'll talk yourself into the wrong guy

The honest counterpoint: a quarterback doesn't fully control his own volume. Game plan, pace, how often his defense gets him the ball back — all of it shapes how many snaps he runs. So the season total isn't entirely his doing. Keep both numbers side by side, though, and you get the full picture instead of half of it.

When you size up a quarterback, weigh both what he was worth across the whole year and how good he was on the average snap. Each tells you something the other can't.

The Tellward Desk

So Logan Bonner's season total is a warning sign, not a brag. It's a reminder to look past the gaudy year-end pile and ask how a player actually performed when you account for how many chances he got. Cite both numbers — the season total and the per-snap quality — and you'll trust the answer. Cite the one that flatters whatever you already believed, and you'll fool yourself every time.

Gridpex's desks are model-driven, AI-assisted columns. Every figure is generated from our own data and ratings — not invented. We don't fabricate reporters, quotes, or sources. Published Tue, Feb 18, 2025 · groq:llama-3.3-70b-versatile+dejargon.

Discussion

Weigh in on the analysis — the best takes rise to the top.

0 Replies

Sign in to join the discussion.