Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Adam Mohammed

#24Adam Mohammed

Adam Mohammed is a Committee Back for Washington. Adam's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 89 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

15%
projected
band 8%'25 15%23%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
523 Rush yards5 Rush TD106 Carries4.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
17 Receptions138 Rec yards0 Rec TD8.1 Yards/rec
Returns
16 Kick returns420 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.56 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Colorado State (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Colorado State: +0.56 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UC Davis: +0.46 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Washington State: -0.40 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Ohio State: -0.06 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Maryland: -0.16 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Rutgers: +0.03 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Michigan: -0.02 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs Wisconsin: -0.10 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Purdue: +0.16 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UCLA: +0.22 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Oregon: +0.47 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Boise State: -0.95 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsColorado StateW38-21-15.67253.6123800.56
2vsUC DavisW70-1014956.8111500.46
4@Washington StateW59-243.86254.201160-0.40
5vsOhio StateL6-2430.13134.301-50-0.06
6@MarylandW24-200.6372.30150-0.16
7vsRutgersW38-191.0284.000.03
8@MichiganL7-2412.4294.50230-0.02
9vsIllinoisW42-2512.9393.002190
11@WisconsinL10-13-4.412544.50210-0.10
12vsPurdueW49-13-6.117593.5312700.16
13@UCLAW48-14-8.7211085.101700.22
14vsOregonL14-2625.9141057.5021800.47
1vsBoise StateW38-103.1263.001-60-0.95

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
15.1%
Passing plays
4.5%
Rushing plays
24.8%
Standard downs
16.5%
Passing downs
11.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.12
Passing downs
0.21
Pass / Rush EPA
0.30 / 0.11

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.