Adam Randall is a Pass-Catching Back for Clemson. Adam's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 209 plays — a developing rate for the RB.
2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays
Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.
2025 Production
Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers
Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.
- ▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
- ▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
- ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.41 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
- ▸Peak game: 0.66 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs LSU (SP+ 10).
NIL Market Tier· 2025
On3 valuation ↗Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value
Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.
| Player | Team | Yr | Plays | WEPA/play | Line val | Total EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saquon Barkley | Penn State | 2016 | 288 | 0.340 | 3.9 | 97.9 |
| Dalvin Cook | Florida State | 2016 | 292 | 0.340 | 4.3 | 99.3 |
| Breece Hall | Iowa State | 2020 | 301 | 0.340 | 4.5 | 102.3 |
Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Car | Rush Yds | Avg | Rush TD | Rec | Rec Yds | Rec TD | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsLSU | L10-17 | 10.3 | 5 | 16 | 3.2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 0.66 |
| 2 | vsTroy | W27-16 | -4.8 | 21 | 112 | 5.3 | 1 | 4 | 23 | 0 | 0.06 |
| 3 | @Georgia Tech | L21-24 | 9.3 | 15 | 80 | 5.3 | 1 | — | — | — | 0.40 |
| 4 | vsSyracuse | L21-34 | -13.1 | 16 | 130 | 8.1 | 0 | 7 | 44 | 1 | 0.35 |
| 6 | @North Carolina | W38-10 | -6.6 | 8 | 30 | 3.8 | 0 | 4 | 73 | 2 | 0.52 |
| 7 | @Boston College | W41-10 | -8.5 | 10 | 36 | 3.6 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0.04 |
| 8 | vsSMU | L24-35 | 13.4 | 10 | 29 | 2.9 | 0 | 5 | 19 | 0 | -0.02 |
| 10 | vsDuke | L45-46 | 6.6 | 16 | 89 | 5.6 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0.19 |
| 11 | vsFlorida State | W24-10 | 7.2 | 15 | 48 | 3.2 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | -0.18 |
| 12 | @Louisville | W20-19 | 12.4 | 15 | 105 | 7.0 | 2 | 3 | 27 | 0 | 0.14 |
| 13 | vsFurman | W45-10 | — | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | -0.29 |
| 14 | @South Carolina | W28-14 | 5.9 | 24 | 102 | 4.3 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | -0.11 |
| 1 | vsPenn State | L10-22 | 18.1 | 11 | 35 | 3.2 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 0 | -0.19 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
- Standard downs
- 0.12
- Passing downs
- 0.07
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 0.14 / 0.10
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).