Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Alex Honig

#86Alex Honig

TE·UConn·2025

Alex Honig is a Red Zone Weapon TE for UConn.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

4%
projected
band 2%'25 4%6%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
13 Receptions162 Rec yards3 Rec TD12.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Red Zone Weapon TE

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency71th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.68 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.47 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Florida Atlantic (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Central Connecticut: -0.10 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Syracuse: +0.33 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Delaware: +1.10 EPA/play3Wk 6 vs Florida International: -0.33 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Boston College: +1.43 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs UAB: +0.55 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Duke: +0.77 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Florida Atlantic: +1.47 EPA/play13
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsCentral ConnecticutW59-13144.004-0.10
2@SyracuseL20-27-13.122110.51150.33
3@DelawareL41-44-10.9111.0111.10
6vsFlorida InternationalW51-10-10.5122.002-0.33
8@Boston CollegeW38-23-8.525527.50401.43
9@RiceL34-37-14.8177.007
10vsUABW38-19-15.811111.00110.55
11vsDukeW37-346.62178.5090.77
13@Florida AtlanticW48-45-8.724422.01321.47

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.6%
Passing plays
6.1%
Rushing plays
0.4%
Standard downs
3.7%
Passing downs
3.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.78
Passing downs
0.77
Pass / Rush EPA
0.60 / 3.96

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.