Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Alonza Barnett

Alonza Barnett

Alonza Barnett is a Dual-Threat QB for James Madison. Alonza's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 430 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

42%
projected
band 24%'25 47%60%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
216/370 Comp/Att2806 Pass yards23 Pass TD8 INT58.4% Comp %
Rushing
589 Rush yards15 Rush TD127 Carries4.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency57th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.15 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.83 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Old Dominion (SP+ 6).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Weber State: +0.36 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Louisville: -0.15 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Liberty: +0.39 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Georgia Southern: +0.20 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Georgia State: -0.17 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Louisiana: +0.40 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Old Dominion: +0.83 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Texas State: +0.37 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Marshall: +0.15 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs App State: +0.25 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Washington State: +0.03 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.20 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Troy: -0.19 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Oregon: -0.02 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsWeber StateW45-1014/221301091.63010.36
2@LouisvilleL14-2812.415/251021023.7-230-0.15
4@LibertyW31-13-9.017/252131183.24520.39
5vsGeorgia SouthernW35-10-9.411/221481047.33210.20
6@Georgia StateW14-7-24.511/22740019.211-0.17
7vsLouisianaW24-14-10.126/402903158.72800.40
8vsOld DominionW63-275.917/252952096.315340.83
10@Texas StateW52-202.312/182644193.89810.37
11@MarshallW35-23-4.514/242703161.03200.15
12vsApp StateW58-10-11.422/353030158.1020.25
13vsWashington StateW24-203.89/181441130.73200.03
14@Coastal CarolinaW59-10-15.115/212073163.53110.20
15vsTroyW31-14-4.810/25931125.2851-0.19
1@OregonL34-5125.923/482732058.4451-0.02

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
47.4%
Passing plays
93.6%
Rushing plays
17.3%
Standard downs
40.3%
Passing downs
63.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
0.23
Pass / Rush EPA
0.16 / 0.44

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.