Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Amari Odom

#2Amari Odom

Amari Odom is a Dual-Threat QB for Kennesaw State. Amari's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 355 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

42%
projected
band 24%'25 47%60%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
189/291 Comp/Att2594 Pass yards19 Pass TD8 INT64.9% Comp %
Rushing
347 Rush yards7 Rush TD120 Carries2.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency73th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.71 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Liberty (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 2 vs Indiana: +0.33 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Merrimack: +0.48 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arkansas State: +0.40 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.46 EPA/play5Wk 10 vs UTEP: -0.06 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs New Mexico State: +0.01 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Jacksonville State: +0.04 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Missouri State: +0.27 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Liberty: +0.71 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Jacksonville State: +0.32 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Western Michigan: -0.05 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
2@IndianaL9-5632.410/161760156.2500.33
3vsMerrimackW27-1312/141081042.22210.48
4vsArkansas StateW28-21-8.825/343081071.010110.40
5vsMiddle TennesseeW24-16-16.011/171622048.53400.46
9@Florida InternationalW45-26-10.510/152051085.7361
10vsUTEPW33-20-17.56/10860078.461-0.06
11@New Mexico StateW24-21-15.514/302193229.62000.01
12@Jacksonville StateL26-35-6.719/312480328.35110.04
13vsMissouri StateW41-34-10.724/343875078.03210.27
14@LibertyW48-42-9.014/232404081.97210.71
15@Jacksonville StateW19-15-6.726/322461070.1-300.32
1vsWestern MichiganL6-41-1.418/352091210.0-290-0.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
47.2%
Passing plays
80.0%
Rushing plays
21.0%
Standard downs
43.0%
Passing downs
56.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.06
Passing downs
0.67
Pass / Rush EPA
0.30 / 0.37

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.