Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Arch Manning

#16Arch Manning

QB·Texas·2025

Arch Manning is a Dual-Threat QB for Texas. Arch's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 393 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

43%
projected
band 25%'25 50%61%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
248/404 Comp/Att3163 Pass yards26 Pass TD7 INT61.4% Comp %
Rushing
399 Rush yards10 Rush TD92 Carries4.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency57th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.28 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.25 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Mississippi State (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Ohio State: -0.13 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs San José State: +0.33 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UTEP: +0.04 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Sam Houston: +1.15 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Florida: +0.21 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Oklahoma: +0.50 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Kentucky: -0.18 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Mississippi State: +2.25 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Vanderbilt: +0.42 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Georgia: -0.02 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arkansas: +0.53 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Texas A&M: +0.12 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Michigan: +0.47 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Ohio StateL7-1430.117/301701158.0380-0.13
2vsSan José StateW38-7-14.319/302954174.42310.33
3vsUTEPW27-10-17.511/251141126.55120.04
4vsSam HoustonW55-0-27.818/213093081.61121.15
6@FloridaL21-293.516/292632270.53700.21
7vsOklahomaW23-618.321/271661089.03400.50
8@KentuckyW16-131.812/271320025.0-10-0.18
9@Mississippi StateW45-384.129/463463157.1612.25
10vsVanderbiltW34-3120.325/333283093.1400.42
12@GeorgiaL10-3524.127/432511159.7-170-0.02
13vsArkansasW52-375.118/303894091.7510.53
14vsTexas A&MW27-1720.714/291791091.55310.12
1vsMichiganW41-2712.421/342212099.115520.47

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
49.5%
Passing plays
82.0%
Rushing plays
14.9%
Standard downs
42.9%
Passing downs
62.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.41
Pass / Rush EPA
0.20 / 0.59

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.