Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Ashten Emory

#1Ashten Emory

RB·UTEP·2025

Ashten Emory is a Committee Back for UTEP. Ashten's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 117 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

16%
projected
band 9%'25 17%23%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
569 Rush yards4 Rush TD119 Carries4.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
16 Receptions103 Rec yards2 Rec TD6.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.78 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Utah State (SP+ -3).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Utah State: +0.78 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UT Martin: +0.54 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Texas: -0.47 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UL Monroe: -0.01 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.21 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Liberty: -0.69 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Kennesaw State: -0.52 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Jacksonville State: +0.41 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Missouri State: +0.24 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs New Mexico State: +0.32 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Delaware: -0.14 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@Utah StateL16-28-3.16315.211900.78
2vsUT MartinW42-1710363.6122020.54
3@TexasL10-2716.21150.504120-0.47
4vsUL MonroeL25-31-21.66193.20-0.01
5vsLouisiana TechL11-30-1.311504.5011000.21
7vsLibertyL8-19-9.0100.00-0.69
8vsSam HoustonW35-17-27.815966.412220
10@Kennesaw StateL20-33-5.410303.00260-0.52
11vsJacksonville StateL27-30-6.710373.701500.41
12@Missouri StateL24-38-10.79556.100.24
13vsNew Mexico StateL31-34-15.51818110.1121100.32
14@DelawareL31-61-10.912292.40180-0.14

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
16.5%
Passing plays
4.2%
Rushing plays
32.9%
Standard downs
18.0%
Passing downs
13.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.08
Passing downs
0.30
Pass / Rush EPA
0.63 / 0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.