Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Bear Bachmeier

#47Bear Bachmeier

QB·BYU·2025

Bear Bachmeier is a Dual-Threat QB for BYU. Bear's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 456 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

45%
projected
band 27%'25 54%63%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
251/387 Comp/Att3033 Pass yards15 Pass TD7 INT64.9% Comp %
Rushing
527 Rush yards11 Rush TD147 Carries3.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency76th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.19 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.88 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Portland State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Portland State: +0.88 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Stanford: +0.03 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs East Carolina: +0.72 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Colorado: +0.37 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs West Virginia: +0.60 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Arizona: +0.21 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Utah: +0.19 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs Texas Tech: +0.06 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs TCU: +0.34 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Cincinnati: +0.12 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UCF: +0.59 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Texas Tech: +0.01 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Georgia Tech: +0.31 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsPortland StateW69-07/11973066.53220.88
2vsStanfordW27-3-11.817/271750024.9710.03
4@East CarolinaW34-138.018/252461085.92610.72
5@ColoradoW24-21-8.319/271792077.69800.37
6vsWest VirginiaW38-24-6.818/253511187.94310.60
7@ArizonaW33-2712.012/291721273.78920.21
8vsUtahW24-2122.213/221661087.46410.19
9@Iowa StateW41-279.922/353072084.3491
11@Texas TechL7-2927.623/381881155.81200.06
12vsTCUW44-138.323/332961093.25910.34
13@CincinnatiW26-144.515/251270068.84610.12
14vsUCFW41-21-1.221/252891087.0400.59
15vsTexas TechL7-3427.616/271150230.5-200.01
1vsGeorgia TechW25-219.327/383251184.2000.31

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
54.1%
Passing plays
96.0%
Rushing plays
23.4%
Standard downs
49.4%
Passing downs
65.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.25
Passing downs
0.37
Pass / Rush EPA
0.27 / 0.35

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.