#4Bishop Davenport

QB·South Alabama·2025

Bishop Davenport is a Dual-Threat QB for South Alabama. Bishop's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 370 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

42%

projected

band 24%'25 47%60%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing

200/294 Comp/Att2072 Pass yards12 Pass TD6 INT68.0% Comp %

Rushing

326 Rush yards9 Rush TD116 Carries2.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

Player type

Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.20 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 0.48 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Morgan State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
1	vsMorgan State	W38-21	—	12/14	166	2	0	10.5	-11	0	0.48
2	vsTulane	L31-33	6.3	17/24	231	2	0	80.2	63	1	0.33
3	@Auburn	L15-31	11.6	18/26	170	2	1	81.0	27	0	0.31
4	vsCoastal Carolina	L20-38	-15.1	22/36	197	0	2	11.2	-23	0	-0.08
5	@North Texas	L22-36	13.8	17/34	195	1	1	48.3	59	1	0.32
6	@Troy	L24-31	-4.8	10/15	104	2	0	60.4	72	1	0.35
8	vsArkansas State	L14-15	-8.8	18/23	118	0	0	17.0	-11	0	0.06
9	@Georgia State	W38-31	-24.5	16/22	280	2	0	92.6	13	1	—
10	vsLouisiana	L22-31	-10.1	20/33	203	1	1	54.8	42	1	-0.03
12	@UL Monroe	W26-14	-21.6	17/23	162	0	0	47.3	50	2	0.35
13	vsSouthern Miss	W42-35	-7.1	20/23	151	0	0	68.1	15	2	0.21
14	@Texas State	L26-49	2.3	13/21	95	0	1	14.4	30	0	-0.14

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

47.4%

Passing plays

94.2%

Rushing plays

17.2%

Standard downs

40.9%

Passing downs

62.2%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.04
Passing downs: 0.38
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.15 / 0.30

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).