Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Blake Horvath

#11Blake Horvath

QB·Navy·2025

Blake Horvath is a Dual-Threat QB for Navy. Blake's 2025 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 334 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

42%
projected
band 24%'25 47%60%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
97/159 Comp/Att1580 Pass yards12 Pass TD6 INT61.0% Comp %
Rushing
1200 Rush yards16 Rush TD224 Carries5.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency79th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.42 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.82 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Air Force (SP+ -3).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs VMI: +0.54 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UAB: +0.73 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tulsa: +0.43 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Rice: +0.55 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Air Force: +0.82 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Temple: +0.44 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs North Texas: -0.02 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs South Florida: +0.10 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Memphis: +0.53 EPA/play14Wk 16 vs Army: +0.15 EPA/play16Wk 1 vs Cincinnati: +0.04 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsVMIW52-76/7661066.51400.54
2vsUABW38-24-15.86/81681060.47220.73
3@TulsaW42-23-10.06/10941272.215910.43
5vsRiceW21-13-14.88/131720167.711020.55
6vsAir ForceW34-31-3.220/263393071.213010.82
7@TempleW32-31-5.16/161411087.815520.44
9vsFlorida AtlanticW42-32-8.78/12830063.11744
10@North TexasL17-3113.88/14800223.11121-0.02
12vsSouth FloridaW41-3811.68/151471059.76000.10
14@MemphisW28-177.65/91001093.05410.53
16vsArmyW17-160.87/14821120.210710.15
1vsCincinnatiW35-134.59/15108205310.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
47.3%
Passing plays
88.9%
Rushing plays
35.0%
Standard downs
42.4%
Passing downs
63.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.59
Pass / Rush EPA
0.53 / 0.30

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.