← Player leaders
Boden Groen is a Versatile TE for Kansas. Boden's 2025 season produced 30.5 total EPA across 34 plays.
2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays
4%
projected
band 2%'25 6%6%
Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.
2025 Production
Receiving
36 Receptions450 Rec yards5 Rec TD12.5 Yards/rec
Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers
Player type
Versatile TE
Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.
Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
- ▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
- ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 1.32 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
- ▸Peak game: 2.55 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Missouri (SP+ 14).
NIL Market Tier· 2025
On3 valuation ↗Elite
Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Rec | Rec Yds | Avg | Rec TD | Long | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsFresno State | W31-7 | 1.8 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 | 1.23 |
| 1 | vsWagner | W46-7 | — | 2 | 53 | 26.5 | 0 | 27 | 1.23 |
| 2 | @Missouri | L31-42 | 14.4 | 1 | 24 | 24.0 | 0 | 24 | 2.55 |
| 4 | vsWest Virginia | W41-10 | -6.8 | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 1 | 7 | 2.54 |
| 5 | vsCincinnati | L34-37 | 4.5 | 5 | 84 | 16.8 | 1 | 24 | 1.27 |
| 6 | @UCF | W27-20 | -1.2 | 2 | 63 | 31.5 | 0 | 46 | 1.66 |
| 7 | @Texas Tech | L17-42 | 27.6 | 13 | 76 | 5.8 | 1 | 24 | 0.24 |
| 9 | vsKansas State | L17-42 | 7.0 | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 0 | 9 | — |
| 10 | vsOklahoma State | W38-21 | -15.1 | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 1 | 3 | -0.19 |
| 11 | @Arizona | L20-24 | 12.0 | 2 | 42 | 21.0 | 0 | 22 | 1.03 |
| 13 | @Iowa State | L14-38 | 9.9 | 5 | 76 | 15.2 | 1 | 34 | 0.70 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.7%
Passing plays
12.4%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
6.6%
Passing downs
3.1%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 0.94
- Passing downs
- 0.65
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 0.90 / —
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).