← Player leaders
Bradyn Anderson is a Vertical Threat WR for Army.
2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays
5%
projected
band 2%'25 4%9%
Regressed toward the WR mean. Model correlation r≈0.47 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.
2025 Production
Receiving
14 Receptions381 Rec yards2 Rec TD27.2 Yards/rec
Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers
Player type
Vertical Threat WR
Elite deep receiver who stretches the field. Wins downfield, commands safety attention, and creates the threat that opens underneath routes.
Downfield threatYAC upsideCreates space for teammates
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Key findings
- ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
- ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 1.81 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
- ▸Peak game: 3.69 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Tarleton State.
NIL Market Tier· 2025
On3 valuation ↗Elite
Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Rec | Rec Yds | Avg | Rec TD | Long | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsTarleton State | L27-30 | — | 1 | 35 | 35.0 | 0 | 35 | 3.69 |
| 2 | @Kansas State | W24-21 | 7.0 | 3 | 64 | 21.3 | 1 | 52 | 3.08 |
| 4 | vsNorth Texas | L38-45 | 13.8 | 1 | 68 | 68.0 | 1 | 68 | 3.34 |
| 8 | @Tulane | L17-24 | 6.3 | 4 | 97 | 24.3 | 0 | 39 | 1.06 |
| 10 | @Air Force | W20-17 | -3.2 | 1 | 42 | 42.0 | 0 | 42 | 1.66 |
| 13 | vsTulsa | L25-26 | -10.0 | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 | 12 | 1.15 |
| 14 | @UTSA | W27-24 | 3.7 | 1 | 32 | 32.0 | 0 | 32 | 0.21 |
| 16 | vsNavy | L16-17 | 6.2 | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 0 | 24 | 0.90 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.9%
Passing plays
22.5%
Rushing plays
0.2%
Standard downs
3.4%
Passing downs
5.3%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 1.82
- Passing downs
- 1.20
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 1.72 / -1.08
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).