Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Broc Lowry

#12Broc Lowry

Broc Lowry is a Dual-Threat QB for Western Michigan. Broc's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 369 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

41%
projected
band 23%'25 45%59%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
166/262 Comp/Att1803 Pass yards9 Pass TD3 INT63.4% Comp %
Rushing
963 Rush yards14 Rush TD203 Carries4.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.18 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.55 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Ball State (SP+ -23).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Michigan State: +0.02 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs North Texas: +0.24 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Illinois: +0.22 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Toledo: +0.13 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Rhode Island: +0.36 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Massachusetts: +0.35 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Ball State: +0.55 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Central Michigan: +0.13 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Ohio: +0.12 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Northern Illinois: +0.03 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.22 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Miami (OH): -0.06 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Kennesaw State: +0.07 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Michigan StateL6-23-3.45/10910045.31900.02
2vsNorth TexasL30-3313.85/10751088.66620.24
3@IllinoisL0-3812.910/16780078.74000.22
4vsToledoW14-136.016/332010147.45020.13
5vsRhode IslandW47-1415/201431058.95210.36
6@MassachusettsW21-3-36.618/251631058.89210.35
7vsBall StateW42-0-23.023/272412071.010810.55
9@Miami (OH)L17-26-3.416/281721057.5820
10vsCentral MichiganW24-21-8.817/241501022.38210.13
12vsOhioW17-13-4.09/141260041.89210.12
13@Northern IllinoisW35-19-16.75/9320177.910030.03
14@Eastern MichiganW31-21-14.77/1410000-1.09220.22
15vsMiami (OH)W23-13-3.48/131110039.2650-0.06
1vsKennesaw StateW41-6-5.412/191202132.02300.07

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
45.1%
Passing plays
81.9%
Rushing plays
27.4%
Standard downs
40.6%
Passing downs
55.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.19
Passing downs
0.19
Pass / Rush EPA
0.14 / 0.26

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.