Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Bryce Underwood

#19Bryce Underwood

Bryce Underwood is a Dual-Threat QB for Michigan. Bryce's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 389 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

43%
projected
band 25%'25 50%61%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
202/335 Comp/Att2428 Pass yards11 Pass TD9 INT60.3% Comp %
Rushing
392 Rush yards6 Rush TD88 Carries4.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency69th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.19 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.79 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Central Michigan (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs New Mexico: +0.43 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Oklahoma: -0.01 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Central Michigan: +0.79 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Nebraska: +0.06 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Wisconsin: +0.32 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs USC: +0.27 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Washington: +0.39 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Purdue: +0.09 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Northwestern: +0.39 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Maryland: +0.32 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Ohio State: -0.22 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Texas: +0.04 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsNew MexicoW34-170.921/312511054.2-500.43
2@OklahomaL13-2418.39/241420040.2-10-0.01
3vsCentral MichiganW63-3-8.816/252351197.111420.79
4@NebraskaW30-276.212/221050072.36110.06
6vsWisconsinW24-10-4.419/282701067.11200.32
7@USCL13-3116.915/242072161.8-400.27
8vsWashingtonW24-718.421/272302063.72500.39
9@Michigan StateW31-20-3.48/17860038.5261
10vsPurdueW21-16-6.113/221450147.64400.09
12vsNorthwesternW24-225.821/322800284.63010.39
13@MarylandW45-200.616/232152094.72000.32
14vsOhio StateL9-2730.18/18630149.210-0.22
1vsTexasL27-4116.223/421992369.46910.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
50.3%
Passing plays
97.7%
Rushing plays
14.1%
Standard downs
42.8%
Passing downs
67.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.34
Pass / Rush EPA
0.23 / 0.39

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.