Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Bryson Barnes

Bryson Barnes

Bryson Barnes is a Dual-Threat QB for Utah State. Bryson's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 507 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

49%
projected
band 31%'25 63%67%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
211/356 Comp/Att2802 Pass yards18 Pass TD5 INT59.3% Comp %
Rushing
740 Rush yards10 Rush TD189 Carries3.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency67th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.17 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.73 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs McNeese.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs UTEP: +0.19 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas A&M: -0.04 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Air Force: +0.66 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs McNeese: +0.73 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Vanderbilt: +0.32 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Hawai'i: +0.04 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs San José State: +0.24 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs Nevada: +0.33 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UNLV: +0.26 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Fresno State: +0.28 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Boise State: +0.09 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Washington State: -0.23 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsUTEPW28-16-17.519/282331045.82910.19
2@Texas A&ML22-4420.715/301692019.0-40-0.04
3vsAir ForceW49-30-3.217/222872078.04430.66
4vsMcNeeseW48-719/272933190.712820.73
5@VanderbiltL35-5520.315/221613077.14800.32
7@Hawai'iL26-441.714/261751128.56400.04
8vsSan José StateW30-25-14.322/313261062.05410.24
9@New MexicoL14-330.913/231641124.640
11vsNevadaW51-14-13.420/272883088.94000.33
12@UNLVL26-294.319/382561065.712410.26
13@Fresno StateW28-171.816/301500170.611300.28
14vsBoise StateL24-253.113/311840033.08910.09
1vsWashington StateL21-343.89/21116015.771-0.23

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
62.6%
Passing plays
88.3%
Rushing plays
36.7%
Standard downs
57.8%
Passing downs
72.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.15
Passing downs
0.37
Pass / Rush EPA
0.20 / 0.35

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.