Bryson Washington is a Committee Back for Baylor. Bryson's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 159 plays — a developing rate for the RB.
2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays
Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.
2025 Production
Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers
Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.
- ▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
- ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.09 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
- ▸Peak game: 0.52 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Houston (SP+ 7).
NIL Market Tier· 2025
On3 valuation ↗Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value
Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.
| Player | Team | Yr | Plays | WEPA/play | Line val | Total EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saquon Barkley | Penn State | 2016 | 288 | 0.340 | 3.9 | 97.9 |
Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Car | Rush Yds | Avg | Rush TD | Rec | Rec Yds | Rec TD | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsAuburn | L24-38 | 11.6 | 14 | 54 | 3.9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | -0.06 |
| 2 | @SMU | W48-45 | 13.4 | 31 | 115 | 3.7 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 0 | -0.10 |
| 3 | vsSamford | W42-7 | — | 21 | 135 | 6.4 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0.50 |
| 4 | vsArizona State | L24-27 | 3.9 | 17 | 111 | 6.5 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 0.27 |
| 5 | @Oklahoma State | W45-27 | -15.1 | 10 | 77 | 7.7 | 1 | — | — | — | 0.28 |
| 6 | vsKansas State | W35-34 | 7.0 | 9 | 65 | 7.2 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 0.15 |
| 8 | @TCU | L36-42 | 8.3 | 11 | 23 | 2.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -0.16 |
| 9 | @Cincinnati | L20-41 | 4.5 | 7 | 23 | 3.3 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 0 | — |
| 10 | vsUCF | W30-3 | -1.2 | 9 | 21 | 2.3 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 0 | -0.28 |
| 12 | vsUtah | L28-55 | 22.2 | 14 | 97 | 6.9 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.23 |
| 13 | @Arizona | L17-41 | 12.0 | 9 | 51 | 5.7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.13 |
| 14 | vsHouston | L24-31 | 7.4 | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.52 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
- Standard downs
- 0.10
- Passing downs
- 0.05
- Pass / Rush EPA
- -0.06 / 0.12
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).
Career · rolling EPA, game by game
Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.