Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Cade Klubnik

#2Cade Klubnik

Cade Klubnik is a Volume Passer for Clemson. Cade's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 460 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

46%
projected
band 28%'25 56%64%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
257/392 Comp/Att2943 Pass yards16 Pass TD6 INT65.6% Comp %
Rushing
94 Rush yards4 Rush TD83 Carries1.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency68th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.10 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.72 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs North Carolina (SP+ -7).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs LSU: -0.02 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Troy: +0.19 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia Tech: +0.15 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Syracuse: +0.13 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs North Carolina: +0.72 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Boston College: +0.61 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Duke: +0.68 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Florida State: +0.10 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Louisville: +0.02 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Furman: +0.33 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs South Carolina: +0.11 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Penn State: -0.05 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsLSUL10-1710.319/3823001-1.010-0.02
2vsTroyW27-16-4.818/241962142.8-400.19
3@Georgia TechL21-249.315/262071156.26210.15
4vsSyracuseL21-34-13.137/603633149.3100.13
6@North CarolinaW38-10-6.622/242544096.4-400.72
7@Boston CollegeW41-10-8.522/302801191.94810.61
10vsDukeL45-466.627/363852087.81200.68
11vsFlorida StateW24-107.220/272211073.4110.10
12@LouisvilleW20-1912.422/341870032.6-600.02
13vsFurmanW45-109/151592061.6-1600.33
14@South CarolinaW28-145.924/392680155.31210.11
1vsPenn StateL10-2218.122/391930043.1-130-0.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
56.3%
Passing plays
90.0%
Rushing plays
17.5%
Standard downs
51.2%
Passing downs
69.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.25
Passing downs
0.14
Pass / Rush EPA
0.24 / 0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
2024 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.