Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Caden Knighten

#22Caden Knighten

Caden Knighten is a Committee Back for Baylor. Caden's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 100 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

14%
projected
band 7%'25 13%22%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
469 Rush yards1 Rush TD104 Carries4.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
11 Receptions134 Rec yards1 Rec TD12.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.09 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.86 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Oklahoma State (SP+ -15).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Auburn: +0.40 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs SMU: -0.18 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Samford: +0.35 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arizona State: -0.30 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Oklahoma State: +0.86 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Kansas State: -0.37 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs TCU: -0.17 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs UCF: +0.30 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Utah: +0.07 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arizona: +0.10 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Houston: -0.12 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsAuburnL24-3811.66294.801410.40
2@SMUW48-4513.47263.702110-0.18
3vsSamfordW42-710343.4132800.35
4vsArizona StateL24-273.9451.301100-0.30
5@Oklahoma StateW45-27-15.158116.2013900.86
6vsKansas StateW35-347.05-6-1.201150-0.37
8@TCUL36-428.310424.20-0.17
9@CincinnatiL20-414.53103.30
10vsUCFW30-3-1.2211045.0012200.30
12vsUtahL28-5522.28222.800.07
13@ArizonaL17-4112.0171005.900.10
14vsHoustonL24-317.48222.80150-0.12

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.2%
Passing plays
2.8%
Rushing plays
28.8%
Standard downs
15.0%
Passing downs
9.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.06
Passing downs
0.35
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.11

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.