Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Cale Hellums

#3Cale Hellums

QB·Army·2025

Cale Hellums is a Dual-Threat QB for Army. Cale's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 370 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

40%
projected
band 22%'25 43%58%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
47/87 Comp/Att694 Pass yards4 Pass TD3 INT54.0% Comp %
Rushing
1215 Rush yards18 Rush TD305 Carries4.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.69 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Tarleton State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Tarleton State: +0.69 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kansas State: +0.27 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs North Texas: -0.09 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs East Carolina: +0.06 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UAB: +0.26 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Charlotte: +0.68 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Tulane: +0.46 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Air Force: +0.41 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Temple: +0.21 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Tulsa: +0.23 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UTSA: +0.10 EPA/play14Wk 16 vs Navy: +0.17 EPA/play16Wk 1 vs UConn: +0.39 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsTarleton StateL27-301/420014.63710.69
2@Kansas StateW24-217.07/11431069.012420.27
4vsNorth TexasL38-4513.80/20010.1230-0.09
5@East CarolinaL6-288.01/3130048.84200.06
6@UABW31-13-15.81/3410016.78130.26
7vsCharlotteW24-7-26.72/4500086.114320.68
8@TulaneL17-246.37/101250069.115520.46
10@Air ForceW20-17-3.25/91021032.69810.41
11vsTempleW14-13-5.11/3260035.511810.21
13vsTulsaL25-26-10.06/10640159.115930.23
14@UTSAW27-243.74/10381043.69000.10
16vsNavyL16-176.25/10820124.410010.17
1vsUConnW41-165.17/81081053.84520.39

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
42.5%
Passing plays
66.1%
Rushing plays
38.9%
Standard downs
40.0%
Passing downs
49.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.35
Passing downs
0.20
Pass / Rush EPA
0.41 / 0.27

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.