Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Caleb Komolafe

#5Caleb Komolafe

Caleb Komolafe is a Committee Back for Northwestern. Caleb's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 168 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

21%
projected
band 14%'25 25%28%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
941 Rush yards11 Rush TD190 Carries5.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
11 Receptions60 Rec yards1 Rec TD5.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency44th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.23 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.44 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs UL Monroe (SP+ -22).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State20162920.3404.399.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Tulane: +0.04 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Western Illinois: +0.25 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Oregon: +0.16 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs UCLA: +0.27 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UL Monroe: +0.44 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Penn State: +0.23 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Purdue: +0.28 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs USC: +0.33 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Michigan: -0.37 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Minnesota: -0.25 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Central Michigan: +0.01 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@TulaneL3-236.39343.801600.04
2vsWestern IllinoisW42-711635.700.25
3vsOregonL14-3425.916533.311-600.16
5vsUCLAW17-14-8.7271194.410.27
6vsUL MonroeW42-7-21.613755.820.44
7@Penn StateW22-2118.119723.811900.23
8vsPurdueW19-0-6.112675.600.28
9@NebraskaL21-286.2171257.42
11@USCL17-3816.9171186.9154000.33
12vsMichiganL22-2412.412312.61-0.37
13vsMinnesotaW38-351.5221295.91121-0.25
1vsCentral MichiganW34-7-8.815553.712900.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
24.8%
Passing plays
3.7%
Rushing plays
43.6%
Standard downs
27.5%
Passing downs
18.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.08
Passing downs
0.36
Pass / Rush EPA
0.08 / 0.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.