Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
CharMar Brown

#6CharMar Brown

RB·Miami·2025

CharMar Brown is a Committee Back for Miami. CharMar's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 122 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

15%
projected
band 7%'25 14%22%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
460 Rush yards7 Rush TD122 Carries3.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
20 Receptions138 Rec yards2 Rec TD6.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency22th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.23 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.90 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Louisville (SP+ 12).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Notre Dame: +0.18 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Bethune-Cookman: +0.18 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs South Florida: -0.04 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Florida: +0.52 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Florida State: +0.01 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Louisville: +0.90 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs SMU: -0.40 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Syracuse: +0.07 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs NC State: +0.44 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Virginia Tech: +0.02 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Pittsburgh: -0.41 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Ole Miss: +0.10 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Ohio State: +0.10 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Indiana: +0.10 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNotre DameW27-2424.415543.6121700.18
2vsBethune-CookmanW45-37355.011400.18
3vsSouth FloridaW49-1211.69222.40111-0.04
4vsFloridaW26-73.518804.4245300.52
6@Florida StateW28-227.28192.400.01
8vsLouisvilleL21-2412.4393.001500.90
9vsStanfordW42-7-11.8591.80
10@SMUL20-2613.49374.10-0.40
11vsSyracuseW38-10-13.18405.0052300.07
12vsNC StateW41-74.88455.611300.44
13@Virginia TechW34-17-10.1294.500.02
14@PittsburghW38-78.48162.00191-0.41
1vsOle MissW31-2724.014543.912700.10
1vsOhio StateW24-1430.15265.211500.10
1vsIndianaL21-2732.4351.7011100.10

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.8%
Passing plays
4.0%
Rushing plays
23.7%
Standard downs
16.2%
Passing downs
6.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.07
Pass / Rush EPA
0.43 / 0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.