← Player leaders
Chase Curtis is a Slot Specialist TE for TCU.
2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays
4%
projected
band 2%'25 3%6%
Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.
2025 Production
Receiving
13 Receptions167 Rec yards2 Rec TD12.8 Yards/rec
Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers
Player type
Slot Specialist TE
The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.
3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
- ▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
- ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
- ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 1.37 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
- ▸Peak game: 2.91 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Abilene Christian.
NIL Market Tier· 2025
On3 valuation ↗Elite
Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Rec | Rec Yds | Avg | Rec TD | Long | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @North Carolina | W48-14 | -6.6 | 1 | 20 | 20.0 | 0 | 20 | 1.76 |
| 3 | vsAbilene Christian | W42-21 | — | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 1 | 11 | 2.91 |
| 5 | @Arizona State | L24-27 | 3.9 | 1 | 21 | 21.0 | 0 | 21 | 0.66 |
| 6 | vsColorado | W35-21 | -8.3 | 2 | 38 | 19.0 | 0 | 27 | 2.83 |
| 7 | @Kansas State | L28-41 | 7.0 | 4 | 27 | 6.8 | 1 | 15 | 1.42 |
| 8 | vsBaylor | W42-36 | 1.4 | — | — | — | — | — | -0.16 |
| 13 | @Houston | W17-14 | 7.4 | 3 | 42 | 14.0 | 0 | 26 | 1.04 |
| 1 | vsUSC | W30-27 | 16.9 | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 | 0.38 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
2.8%
Passing plays
4.8%
Rushing plays
0.4%
Standard downs
1.9%
Passing downs
4.8%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 0.57
- Passing downs
- 2.23
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 1.57 / -0.16
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).