Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Christian Moss

#6Christian Moss

Christian Moss is a Versatile WR for Kennesaw State. Christian's 2025 season produced 46.5 total EPA across 49 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

7%
projected
band 3%'25 6%10%

Regressed toward the WR mean. Model correlation r≈0.47 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
44 Receptions682 Rec yards2 Rec TD15.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 2.73 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Liberty (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh2016630.5301.633.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 2 vs Indiana: +0.84 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Merrimack: +0.60 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arkansas State: +0.21 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Middle Tennessee: +2.54 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Louisiana Tech: +1.29 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs UTEP: -0.14 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs New Mexico State: +0.12 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Jacksonville State: +1.75 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Missouri State: +0.60 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Liberty: +2.73 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Jacksonville State: +2.03 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Western Michigan: -0.51 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
2@IndianaL9-5632.455410.80210.84
3vsMerrimackW27-1366811.30250.60
4vsArkansas StateW28-21-8.868414.00220.21
5vsMiddle TennesseeW24-16-16.02.54
7vsLouisiana TechW35-7-1.346616.50251.29
9@Florida InternationalW45-26-10.529346.5170
10vsUTEPW33-20-17.5263.007-0.14
11@New Mexico StateW24-21-15.511212.00120.12
12@Jacksonville StateL26-35-6.747218.00271.75
13vsMissouri StateW41-34-10.746817.00400.60
14@LibertyW48-42-9.037224.01302.73
15@Jacksonville StateW19-15-6.757515.00262.03
1vsWestern MichiganL6-41-1.42126.008-0.51

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.0%
Passing plays
13.2%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
5.1%
Passing downs
8.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.64
Passing downs
1.36
Pass / Rush EPA
0.95 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.